Advocacy Masterclass – Opening and Closing Statements at Civil Trial - Part 2

Opening and closing statements present Counsel with the opportunity to capture the attention of their audience, deliver key facts, summarize critical evidence introduced at trial, and cement their theory of the case in the minds of the trier of fact. Often identified as the most important components of a trial, it is critical for litigators to ensure that they have the skills necessary to effectively and persuasively open and close their case.

The Advocacy Masterclass – Opening and Closing Statements at Civil Trial program will provide you with the information you need to craft and deliver effective opening and closing statements. Featuring an esteemed panel of trial tested litigators, from both the Plaintiff and Defence perspective, with the additional benefit of views from the bench, participants can expect to receive invaluable insights into how opening and closing statements can be used to maximize their case at trial.

The panel discussion will feature, among other topics:

• Insights as to the goals of opening and closing statements, and how to achieve those goals;
• Tips for tailoring your approach for trial in front of judge or jury; and,
• Discussions on how to properly and effectively deal with opposing counsel.

Agenda re Professionalism Content (45 minutes)

We will discuss the proper way to raise objections and deal with improper comments made by opposing counsel during the course of their opening and closing statements.

We will also discuss what should and should not be discussed during openings and closings. These discussions will focus on ensuring that Counsel ensures compliance with their obligations under the Rules of Professional Conduct. As such, the program will deal with the following subheadings under ethical advocacy:

• Practising with civility in the courtroom or the boardroom (9 minutes for all three speakers)
• Treating the court, tribunal, opposing counsel, parties and others with courtesy and respect (9 minutes for all three speakers)
• Refraining from sharp practice (9 minutes for all three speakers)
• Encouraging respect for legal institutions or authorities (9 minutes for all three speakers)
• Complying with parameters for communicating with jurors (9